Optimalisasi desain instruksional untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di sekolah dasar
Optimization of instructional design to enhance the effectiveness of Indonesian language learning in elementary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70287/epistemic.v4i3.503Keywords:
instructional design, Indonesian language, elementary school, basic literacyAbstract
This study aims to analyze and develop effective instructional designs for teaching Indonesian language in elementary schools. The main problems identified include low student motivation, difficulties in reading comprehension, limited learning media, and minimal student engagement during the learning process. This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach through observation, teacher interviews, and literature study. The results show that the application of instructional design based on a constructivist approach, the use of visual and digital media, and the application of active learning strategies can improve students' conceptual understanding, reading interest, and literacy skills. In addition, student engagement in learning increased significantly when teachers acted as facilitators and mentors. This study recommends the development of adaptive, contextual, and student-centered instructional designs to create a more interactive, meaningful, and relevant Indonesian language learning process that meets the developmental needs of elementary school students.
References
Aminah, S., & Rachmadiarti, F. (2022). Pelatihan desain pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 13 (2), 123–134.
Ansya, Y. A. U. (2023). Upaya Meningkatkan Minat dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar pada Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Strategi PjBL (Project-Based Learning). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.30872/jimpian.v3i1.2225
Arista, D. (2023). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) dan Hambatannya di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 15(1), 45–58. `https://doi.org/10.21009/JPD.015.01.04`
Branch, R. M. (2021). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (3rd ed.). Springer. `https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6821-7`
Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31. `https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.302`
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M.-T., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2019). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, *43*, 1–13. `https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.02.009`
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2018). Survey of instructional development models (5th ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
Haberman, M. (2010). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. *Phi Delta Kappan, 92(2), 81–87.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. `https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487`
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2014). The action research planner (4th ed.). Springer. `https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2`
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2018). Introducing TPCK. In M. J. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (2nd ed., pp. 3–12). Routledge. `https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328`
Kurniawati, N., Suryadi, A., & Kurniawan, D. T. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5 (5), 4091–4098. `https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1397`
Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Murata, A. (2019). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14. `https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003`
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. `https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355`
Nurfaidah, S. S. (2024). Pendekatan Berdiferensiasi dalam Pembelajaran Literasi Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6 (1), 102–115. `https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5501`
Purnomo, H. (2022). The effect of digital formative assessment on students' reading comprehension in elementary school. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)*, 16*(4), 478–485. `https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i4.20475`
Putri, A. R., & Mulyati, Y. (2023). Pengembangan E-Modul Interaktif Berbasis Project Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Membaca Siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, *7*(2), 287–296. `https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i2.57981`
Sari, E. P., & Hidayat, M. T. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Membaca melalui Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan Media Big Book di Sekolah Dasar. *Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 8*(3), 789–799. `https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v8i3.2678`
Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, *67*, 291–301. `https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020`
Syarif, M. Z., Wulandari, S., & Hasanah, N. (2024). Desain instruksional responsif untuk meningkatkan literasi kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, *15*(2), 120–134.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
Voelkel Jr, R. H., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, *28*(4), 505–526. `https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1299015`
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wijaya, I. K., & Sudatha, I. G. W. (2023). Interactive digital book based on local wisdom to improve reading literacy of elementary school students. Journal of Education Technology, 7(1), 169–178. `https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i1.57982`
Willis, J. (2007). The neuroscience of joyful education. Educational Leadership, *64*(9), 1–5.
Yuliani, T. (2023). Efektivitas Media Video Animasi dan Kuis Digital dalam Meningkatkan Minat Baca dan Pemahaman Membaca Siswa Kelas IV SD. *Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia*, *12*(2), 301–312. `https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi.v12i2.59015`
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi (Kemendikbudristek). (2023). Laporan hasil asesmen nasional 2022. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran.
Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Guru (Pusmendik). (2023). Pedoman pelatihan guru dalam pengembangan media interaktif pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Zahra, R. M., Sumiyadi, M., Cahyani, I., Sastromiharjo, A., & Nuphanudin, M. (2025). Panduan Model Pembelajaran Menulis Cerpen Berbasis Prosinek. Indonesia Emas Group.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Epistemic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
